Needles and Haystacks

At work we have a tool that analyzes the code we write. It looks for possible problems and bugs. It’s pretty impressive.

And really prolific.

The problem with it is that it reports literally hundreds of potential problems, when in reality there may only be a few real bugs. So we can spend a lot of time digging through the reports deciding which items are real and which are not.

It’s a lot like looking for a needle in a haystack, and because of that it can be rather frustrating. Especially when you’re not quite sure whether something really is a needle or is just a piece of hay.

But if you think that’s bad, you should check out our legislation sometime.

A recent Ensign article reiterated (again) the prophets’ counsel to be involved in our communities and nations. For myself, I have tried to follow somewhat what my state legislature has been doing. And holy cow. Talk about a lot of static. Between the sheer amount of noise and the regular busy-ness of life my own efforts were a whole lot less than I’d hoped.

But I did do a little. Hopefully I can continue doing at least a little.

There are so many problems and so many issues. There’s so much that needs to be done. It’s more like a stack of needles with maybe a few pieces of hay in it. Everyone is needed. In 2012 I wrote that we all have responsibility for what happens in our communities, states, and nations–good and bad, and I still believe that. They are shaped by our voices. Or by the lack thereof.

So do something. Write in a blog. Post something (worthwhile) on Facebook. Even better, write to your representatives. Let your opinion be known at a city council meeting. Volunteer at a library, homeless shelter or soup kitchen.

Make your voice heard. Maybe only a few people will hear it, but that’s OK. Do what you can. It will make a difference.

 

1 thought on Needles and Haystacks

  1. A very nice summary Jeremy Robertson. When are you running for office?

    The last republican caucus I was at had a small group of clearly trained candidates. They were the ones who were already in charge. They wanted to avoid going over issues at all. When they agreed to do so, it was in the form of a 30 second summary by each person who wanted to be elected. Those individual’s summaries were all so polished, and so oddly identical. They clearly knew what would garner votes and they all won.

    If you want my honest opinion about why the church is asking everyone to go to their caucuses. It is because there is a very effective political machine in parts of Utah that keeps itself running and is part of why many of our candidates are so lousy. It can only be overthrown by an interested and attentive majority.

Leave a Reply